Sunday, 1 December 2013

Practical 2

Practical 2: Sieving
Aim:
To determine the particles size distribution of lactose and microcrystalline cellulose    (MCC) by using the sieving method.
Introduction:
The particle-size distribution (PSD) of a powder, or granular material, or particles dispersed in fluid, is a list of values or a mathematical function that defines the relative amount, typically by mass, of particles present according to size. PSD is also known as grain size distribution. The way PSD is usually defined is by the method by which it is determined. The most easily understood method of determination is sieve analysis, where powder is separated on sieves of different sizes. In this experiment we are using the sieving method via the help from the sieving shaker’s machine. The use of sieves with different sized mesh is one of the oldest, most reliable, and most commonly used methods for providing an analysis of particle size distribution. Although sieve shakers have limitations based on the assumption that all particles are spherical, they work well for a wide variety of applications, and because it is relatively inexpensive, is generally the first method employed by companies when a particle size distribution analysis program is initiated.
 Moreover, sieving, microscopy, computerized image analysis, laser diffraction, sedimentation, and centrifugation, are some of the particle size analysis methods by which a samples particle characterization may be established.

Procedure:
1)      A 100g of lactose is weighed by using the weighing balance.
2)      A set of  sieve nest is prepared according to descending order from top to below the size must be from larger to smallest diameter of the sieve plate.
3)      Then the lactose is placed into the top of the sieve nest. The set of the sieve nest is then being set up to the sieve shaker’s machine.
4)      The machine is start and the time is set up at 15 minutes.
5)      After the sieving is done, the remaining lactose that is left at every stage of the sieve is weighed and a graph of particle size of distribution is plotted.
6)      The process is repeated by using microcrystalline cellulose (MCC).



Results:

<45 mic 

 45 mic

46-150 mic

151-300 mic


301-425 mic

426-500 mic
           WEIGHED
Size of
Sieve nest (µm)
lactose (g)
MCC (g)
(%) lactose
(%)
MCC
sieve 1 (UP) (426-500)
0.0162
0.0035
0.0162
0.0035
sieve 2  (301-425)
0.0267
0.0043
0.0267
0.0043
sieve 3   (151-300)
0.016
0.0787
0.016
0.0787
sieve 4   (46-150)
30.5684
4.9485
30.5684
4.9485
sieve 5    (45)
57.515
51.8688
57.515
51.8688
sieve 6    ( <45 )
11.1436
42.1931
11.1436
42.1931
Total %

99.2859
99.0969








Calculation:
% of particles passing through the sieve nest=
 weighed of substance after sieving x 100
total weight of substance before sieve

example1, lactose (sieve 1): 0.0162x100
                                                100
                                           =0.0162 %




Size of particles (µm) vs percentage of lactose/MCC passing through the sieve nest



Discussion:
In this experiment, we are using the sieve method in order to determine the particles size distribution between lactose and microcrystalline cellulose by using the sieving shaker machine. Note that we row the sieve stack from the top to the bottom according to the size of the sieve nest that is from largest size (top) to the smallest size (bottom). From the result we can say that the MCC have a smaller size of molecules because it can pass through the bottom of the sieve more than lactose. Moreover we can predict that the size of MCC is <45µm because it can pass through the sieve nest of the size of  <45 µm. While for the lactose, we can predict that the size of particles of lactose is approximately 45µm because mostly lactose are well distributed until at the size of sieve of 45µm.
 Thus this supports the theory as we can determine the particle size distribution by using sieving method. If we notice that the total percentage of particles passing through the sieve nest are not exactly 100%, supposedly we should get both lactose and MCC 100% but due to some errors we only get 99.2859% of lactose and 99.0969% of MCC. This might be due to some errors during the experiment. For examples, there might be errors during transferring of substance from sieve nest to weighing boat; maybe not all of the substances are perfectly being transferred, thus this will effects the results.

Question:
1.      What are the average particle size for lactose and MCC?
Even there still have a small portion of particle size for lactose and MCC between size 150µm and 500µm, the overall average particle size for lactose and MCC are found within less than 150µm. Based on the result, MCC have a smaller size of molecules because it can pass through the bottom of the sieve more than lactose.

2.      What are the other method that can be used to identify the size of  a particle rather than sieving method?
The other method that can be used to identify the size of  a particle rather than sieving method are microscopy methods, laser light scattering method, dynamic light scattering method, backlight imaging, direct imaging, sedimentation method and electrical stream sensing zone method (coulter counter).

3.      What are the importance of particle size in a certain formulation?
The particle size of a substance is important to make a certain formulation. The size of a particle can affect bulk properties, product performance, processibility, stability and appearance of the end product. The link between particle size and product performance is well documented with regards to dissolution, absorption rates and content uniformity. Reducing particle size can aid the formulation of NCE’s with poor water solubility. Proper matching of active ingredient and excipient particle size is important for several process steps. Particle size analysis is an integral component of the effort to formulate and manufacture many pharmaceutical dosage forms

Conclusion:
From the result of the experiment we can say that microcrystalline cellulose has a greater distribution of particles compare to lactose as its size much smaller than lactose that is <45µm  thus make it more reliable to pass through the sieve nest. And we can agree that sieve method also can be used in order to determine the particle size distribution although it may have some limitations as compared to the other method.
References:
                                     

No comments:

Post a Comment