Monday, 12 May 2014

Experiment 4 - Ointment


Experiment 4: The effects of differences characteristic of active ingredient in formulation of  ointment.

Objectives:
1) To study the effects of difference amount of emulsifying wax, white soft paraffin and liquid paraffin used in the formulation of ointment.
2) To describe and elaborate the texture, clarity and colour of ointment that was formed


INTRODUCTION
Ointment formulation is a semi-solid dosage forms that is suitable for application on the skin and for external use only. An ointment is an oily base preparation and consists of one or more drugs distributed homogenously in base and can be absorbed through the skin for systemic action. A good ointment must have an interesting texture, easy to spread on the skin and release the active ingredient. Ointments are formulated using hydrophobic, hydrophilic, or water-emulsifying bases to provide preparations that are immiscible, miscible, or emulsifiable with skin secretion. Ointment bases are intended to soften but not melt when applied to the skin.
The purpose of an ointment bases include as a vehicle from which the drug may be absorbed by the skin and as a protective layer or emollient for the skin. Different composition of base will greatly affect the pharmacologic effect of a particular drug. This includes stability, penetrability, solvent property, approximately neutral with regard to pH, and ease of application and removal. Therefore in pharmaceutical aspects, choice of bases should be made carefully to obtain optimum drug distribution.
The purpose of the laboratory is studying the effects of different ointment composition on physical characteristics, ointment formed and the rate of drug release from it.

Apparatus:  Weighing balance, 1 weighing boat, 100mL beaker, heater, I set of slap and spatula, 1 set of mortar and pestle, 1 dialysis bag (10cm), thread, glass rod, water-bath, pipette and pipette bulb, Spectrophotometer UV.
Materials:  Emulsifying wax, White soft paraffin, Liquid paraffin, Acetylsalicylic acid, distilled water.

PROCEDURE
1.  50g of emulsifying ointment was prepared through formulation as following:
Emulsifying ointment
Group
 Ingredients
Total (g)
Emulsifying Wax
White Soft Paraffin
Liquid Paraffin
I
1,5
21
25
4
50
II
2,6
17
25
8
50
III
3,7
13
25
12
50
IV
4,8
9
25
16
50

2.  5g of ointment was taken from the total of 50g and was placed into weighing boat and labelled. The texture, clarity and colour of ointment was observed and compared.
3.  1.5g of Acetylsalicyclic acid was incorporated into 30g of made ointment by using levigation. (Acetylsalicyclic acid powder was crushed into finer particles using mortar and pestle if required.)
4.  The Acetylsalicyclic acid ointment was filled into dialysis bag. Both ends of the bag were tied.
5.  The dialysis bag was placed into 100ml beaker which contains 50ml of saline water and  heated in water-bath to 370C.
6.  One aliquot sample (3-4ml) was pipetted at an interval of 5 minutes. Rate of release of Acetylsalicyclic acid from the ointment tube was determined by using UV-visible spectrometer. The saline water was stirred by glass rod before the sample was taken.


RESULT AND DISCUSSION

1. Compare and discuss the physical properties of ointment prepared. 

Throughout the experiment, we prepare four 50g Emulsifying Ointments of different composition ratio. Emulsifying Ointment I consists of 21g of Emulsifying Wax, 25g of White Soft Paraffin and 4g of Liquid Paraffin; Emulsifying Ointment II consists of 17g of Emulsifying Wax, 25g of White Soft Paraffin and 8g of Liquid Paraffin; Emulsifying Ointment III consists of 13g of Emulsifying Wax, 25g of White Soft Paraffin and 12g of Liquid Paraffin; Emulsifying Ointment IV consists of 9g of Emulsifying Wax, 25g of White Soft Paraffin and 16g of Liquid Paraffin.

Each of the ointments prepared has different physical appearance. In terms of spreadability, Emulsifying Ointment IV is the most spreadable, followed by Emulsifying Ointment III, and Emulsifying Ointment II. As compared, Emulsifying Ointment I is the least spreadable among all.

In the aspect of greasiness, Emulsifying Ointment IV is the greasiest, followed by Emulsifying Ointment III, and Emulsifying Ointment II. Emulsifying Ointment I is the least greasy.

In terms of hardness, Emulsifying Ointment I is the hardest, followed by Emulsifying Ointment II, and Emulsifying Ointment III. Emulsifying Ointment IV is the softest.

Based on these comparisons, we found that the physical properties of Emulsifying Wax are tends to be more solidified in semisolid preparation. We can know this through the observation on its hardness, greasiness and spreadability. It tends to decrease in greasiness and spreadability while increasing in hardness.

On the other hand, Paraffin Oil tends to be more liquidified in semisolid preparation. Based on its physical properties, Paraffin Oil is increase its greasiness and spreadability while decreasing in hardness.

Therefore, to prepare an ideal ointment, we must balance the composition of Emulsifying Wax and Paraffin Oil so that the ointment produced will not be neither too hard nor too soft. 

2. Plot a graph of UV absorbtion against time. Explain



This graph shows the reading obtained from the UV spectrometer. The UV spectrometer measures the releasing of acetylsalicylic acid from the ointment in the dialysis bag immersed in the 100 ml 37°C distilled water. The mass of emulsifying wax is 9 g, white soft paraffin is 25 g, and liquid paraffin is 16 g. Overall, the graph shows the gradual increasing in the absorption of UV with a large increase at the initial. Initially, at the first 10 minutes, the UV absorption value surge up follow by gradual increasing of the UV absorption value until 30 minutes.                                 
            The great increase in the UV absorption value at the first 10 minutes is due to the great concentration difference between content in dialysis tube and the distilled water. The content of in the dialysis bag is hypertonic to the distilled water. So, large amount of ointment with acetylsalicylic acid diffuses to the distilled water with high concentration gradient different. The amount of ointment diffuse is proportional to the acetylsalicylic acid. The high value of UV absorption may due to the presence of residual at both end of the dialysis bag, left during the insertion of ointment into the dialysis bag. So when the dialysis bag is immersed in the distilled water, the residual will dissolve in the water. This makes there are content of acetylsalicylic acid that are not from the diffusion through the dialysis bag. After the residual at both end of dialysis bag has dissolved all, the acetylsalicylic acid diffused out only through the pore of dialysis bag, so the readings between 10 to 20 minutes show regular increase. A sudden large increase in the UV absorption does not occur after 10 minutes as the concentration gradient across the dialysis bag decrease, the amount of acetylsalicylic acid in the distilled water increases with time. The gradual increase in the UV absorption indicates the gradual release of acetylsalicylic acid from the dialysis bag. The concentration of content in distilled water gradually equals the concentration of the content in dialysis bag. This will result in the reduced increase in the UV absorption when time passes by.
            If the experiment is continued beyond 30 minutes, it may result in a straight line graph as the concentration of acetylsalicylic acid in the distilled water equals to the concentration of acetylsalicylic acid at the dialysis bag. The content in dialysis bag is isotonic to the distilled water content concentration.
            Some of the precautious steps can be taken during conducting the experiment are to avoid over stirring the distilled water as this might break the dialysis bag and result a large amount release of the ointment from it. Besides, the residual that retained at both end of the dialysis bag should be removed before immersing the dialysis bag in the distilled water to ensure accuracy of the result. The rope should tie both end of the dialysis bag tightly to prevent leakage of the ointment. The cuvette should be cleaned for the fingerprint around the surface of it so that the measurement is correct. The distilled water in the beaker should cover the whole dialysis bag to ensure consistent diffusion.

3. Plot a graph of UV Absorption against time for ointment formulations of different composition. Compare and discuss the results obtained.


Time (min)
UV Adsorption
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
UV absorption at 300nm
0.063
0.121
0.212
0.224
0.235
0.294
0.331




The ideal ratio of amount Emulsifying Wax, White Soft Paraffin and Liquid Paraffin in the preparation ointment is 30 : 50 : 20. Theoretically, an ointment that contains the highest amount of emulsifying wax and lowest amount of liquid paraffin will take longer time for the acetylsalicylic acid to penetrate from the dialysis membrane. This results in the lowest reading of UV absorption by the acetylsalicylic acid. This can be explained by the theory stated that when there is a low amount of emulsifying wax,  the acetylsalicylic acid cannot disperse well in the ointment. As we increase the amount liquid paraffin in the formulation, greater amount of acetylsalicylic acid is able to penetrate the dialysis membrane at a faster rate. This is due to the role of liquid paraffin in the formulation that improves hydration, thus increase the effectiveness of the absorption of the ointment at the percutaneous membrane.

In the experiment conducted, four formulations were prepared. The formulations possessed different amount of emulsifying wax and liquid paraffin. Results obtained have shown that Formulation 1 which contained the least amount of liquid paraffin resulted in the lowest UV absorption value. Formulation 3 showed higher UV absorption than Formulation 1. This is followed by Formulation 4 and Formulation 2 with the greatest amount of UV absorption. As the amount of emulsifying wax reduces, with an increase in the amount of liquid paraffin, the UV absorption of acetylsalicylic acid should increase. From the results obtained, there is a slight inaccuracy because supposedly Formulation 2 shows lower UV absorption than Formulation 3 and Formulation 4. This inaccuracy might be due to several possible errors done during the experiment.

The possible errors may be due to the inaccurate measurement of amount of ingredients used in the formulation prepared. This will affect the permeation rate of Acetylsalicylic acid and the UV absorption. Secondly, the absorption of UV may get affected by the inaccurate or different amount of ointment filled in the dialysis bag. Besides, the presence of contaminants on the dialysis bag could also contribute to the inconsistent results. Moreover, the spillage of the drug from the dialysis could be one of the errors that could alter the results. 

4. What is the function of each materials used in this ointment preparation? How the different ratio of emulsifying wax and liquid paraffin used influence the physical characteristics of an ointment formulation and the rate of drug release from the ointment preparation.
Liquid paraffin is used as a blending base and as an emollient. It also helps to increase the spreadibility of the ointment to be easier to be applied on the skin. Besides, it is usually formulated with white or yellow soft paraffin to achieve the required viscosity for application to the required site.
White soft paraffin has also give advantage as a skin protectant. It is a hydrophobic compound that repels water and retaining the moisture of the skin. Since white soft paraffin is a rich emollient, it has the ability to penetrate deeper into the skin than other lotions or compounds. Its contribution to the thickness of the compound forms a barrier on the skin that further prevents additional water from escaping the top layers of the skin.
Emulsifying wax has emulsifying properties. It has the function of increasing the viscosity of oil-in-water emulsions, thereby improving their stability, and also gives emollient effect when added to paraffin ointment. High ratio of emulsifying wax in the ointment will increase the rate of release of drug as it act as surfactant that decrease the surface tension and hence increase absorption. It will assist in improving the consistency and texture of final product without leaving a greasy film on the outer skin after application. It also controls the rheological properties of the system by their interaction with water and other excipients in the external phase. The unique characteristics of emulsifying wax give certain solidity to emulsified solutions, enables product to easily spread and glide on the skin. It is also used as an emulsifier, which enables the blend of oil and water to prevent bleeding and phase separation.
Liquid paraffin is a viscosity builder. Thus, the higher the amount of liquid paraffin used, the more viscous of an ointment and the slower the drugs or active ingredients being released. High contain of liquid paraffin will cause the ointment become greasy. Liquid paraffin is usually used in combination with white soft paraffin. An appropriate combination of liquid paraffin with white soft paraffin will give an ointment with desirable properties. Emulsifying wax is a penetration enhancer. Thus, the higher the amount of emulsifying wax added, the faster the drug release rates. Besides, an emulsifying wax is to soften and give thickness to ointments. Hence, a high content of emulsifying wax cause the ointment become hard. In conclusion, the standard ratio of emulsifying wax: white soft paraffin: liquid paraffin is 3:5:2. The ratio of emulsifying wax must be higher than liquid paraffin as emulsifying wax acts to release drug rapidly from the ointment preparation. Liquid paraffin is used to increase the spredibility of the ointment.

CONCLUSION

Different compositions of bases for ointment formulation affect the physical characteristics and its release rate of drug.

REFERENCES

1.http://intranet.tdmu.edu.ua/data/kafedra/internal/pharma_3/lectures_stud/Industrial%20drugs%20technology/4-course/English/Ointmants..htm
2.    Aulton, M.E.2002. Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Form Design. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.  
3.      Pharmaceutics, The Science of Dosage Form Design, Michael Aulton, 3rd Edition 
4.      Kalur, G. C, Frounfelker, B. D, Cipriano, B. H, Norman, A.L, Raghavan, S. R, 
5.      ViscosityIncrease with Temperature in Cationic Surfactant Solutions Due to the
6.      Growth of Wormlike Micelles, 2005, American Chemical Society.

Thursday, 8 May 2014

Experiment 3 - Suppository

TITLE
Assessing the effect of different content material on the characteristics of a suppository formulation.

OBJECTIVES
To study the effects of cooperating different composition of bases on the physical characteristics of the suppository formed and its release rate of drugs.

INTRODUCTION
            Suppositories are used mainly for the administration of drugs via the rectal route and it is generally consists of vehicle in which the drug is incorporated and in some cases additives are coformulated. There are two main classes of suppositories vehicles which are glyceride type fatty bases and the water soluble base. Note that the viscosity of the molten bases plays an important role in which they determine the flow into the moulds and also the separation of the drug particles. During and after melting in the rectal cavity the suppository mass is forced to spread over the absorbing surface, the rate of which may be determined partly by its viscosity. A good suppositories base should be chemically and physically stable during storage as a bulk product, nontoxic, inert, should have no incompatibilities with drug molecules and should permits an optimal release of the drug it contains. In this experiment, we used macrogols type of bases in which it consists of mixtures of polyethylene glycols (PEG) of different molecular weight eg: PEG 1000 and PEG 6000 and we also determine the effect of using only single PEG molecular weight on the suppositories formulation eg: PEG 6000.
            Paracetamol is as an antipyretic and analgesic agent, and is currently available for oral and rectal administration as different preparations. The rectal suppositories are often essential for treating febrile children with emesis or the circumstances in which oral treatment is contraindicated. Previous studies on the antipyretic efficacy of rectal paracetamol have shown conflicting results.  Drugs administered distally by pass the liver, whereas drugs administered in the proximal part of the rectum are drained into the portal system and are subject to the hepatic first-pass effect. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) was used in the experiment as it possess many desirable properties.  PEG are chemically stable, nonirritating, miscible with water and mucous secretions, and can be formulated, either by molding or compression, in a wide range of hardness and melting point. It does not melt at body temperature, but dissolve to provide a prolonged release drug. Some polyethylene glycol polymers may be used singly as suppository bases but, more commonly, formulas call for compounds of two or more molecular weights mixed in various proportions as needed to yield a finished product of satisfactory hardness and dissolution time.

APPARATUS

Weighing balance, weighing boat, spatula, 50ml beaker, 100ml beaker, hotplate, measuring cylinder, suppository mould, water bath (370C), dialysis bag (10cm), thread, glass rod, 5ml pipette and a pipette-bulb, plastic cuvette and spectrophotometer UV/Vis.

MATERIALS
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 1000, Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000, Paracetamol.


EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
1. Saturated solution of Paracetamol stock is prepared (10g in 5ml distilled water).
2. Paracetamol suppository (10g) is formulated using the formula as below:

Suppository
Group
Material (g)
Paracetamol stock solution (g)
Total (g)
PEG 1000
PEG 6000
I
1, 5
9
0
1
10
II
2, 6
6
3
1
10
III
3, 7
3
6
1
10
IV
4, 8
0
9
1
10

3. The suppository is shaped by using the suppository-mould. The shape, texture, and colour of the formed suppository is described and compared.
4. One suppository is put into the beaker containing distilled water (10ml, 370C) and the time for the suppository melt is recorded.
5. One other suppository is put into the dialysis bag and both the end of the bed is tied neatly. The bag then is put into the beaker (100ml) containing distilled water (50ml) that has been heated to a temperature of 370C.

6. In 5 minutes interval, an aliquot of the sample is pipette (3-4ml) and the released Paracetamol from the suppository is determined using the spectrophotometer UV/Vis. The distilled water is stirred first using a glass rod before taking the sample.



QUESTION AND DISCUSSION

1. Differentiate the physical characteristics of suppository and give your comment.


Physical characteristics
                                         Suppositories
I
II
III
IV
Shape
Torpedo
Torpedo
Torpedo
Torpedo
Physical state
Solid
Solid
Solid
Solid
Hardness
Hard
Hard
Hard
Very hard
Appearance
Dull
Shiny
Dull
Dull
Colour
White
White
White
White

            The shape of the suppositories produced is according to the shape of the mould. Torpedo shape of suppositories eases the administration into the rectum.

            When the bases, PEG 1000 and PEG 6000 melted and cool down, the mixture solidified at room temperature.

            PEG 1000 is a soft solid whereas PEG 6000 is a hard solid. The hardness depends on the molecular weight of PEG. The number indicates the average molecular weight of PEG. Mixing these two PEGs in the formulation with different ratio will result in different hardness. Using a higher ratio of PEG 6000 to PEG 1000 will result in a harder suppository. Therefore, the hardness of suppository increases from formulation I to IV.

           Most of the suppositories appear dull. Only suppository II appears shiny on the surface. All suppositories are white in colour, showing the original colour of the bases used and also the colour of paracetamol.



2. Plot a graph of the average time taken for the suppository to melt against the amount of PEG 6000 used in the formulation. Compare and discuss the results obtained.




The two bases that were used in the formulation of the paracetamol suppository prepared in the experiment are polyethylene glycol (PEG) 1000 and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. The use of different molecular weight of PEG in the formulation is to attain desired requirements in the production of suppository with different intended applications. Molecular weight of PEG will affect both the physical and chemical stability of the suppository. This explains why the suppositories with different amount of PEG of different molecular weight exhibit different melting point. Theoretically, as the molecular weight of PEG used increases, the melting point of the suppository will also increase. This will prolong the time taken for the suppository formulation to melt.

In the experiment, the amount of PEG 6000 used varied from 0 g to 9 g. As the amount of PEG 6000 increases from 0 g to 3 g, the average time taken for the suppository to melt has shown an increase too. But when the amount of PEG 6000 was further added to 6 g and 9 g, the shorter time needed for the suppository to melt at 37 degree Celsius. This shows some inaccuracy in the results obtained and recorded, as we compare to the theoretical readings that were supposed to be obtained.

The inaccuracy might be due to some errors made during the experiment. First, the temperature at which the suppository was melt should be constant until the whole suppository melt. The longer time taken indicates that the higher melting point of the suppository. If the suppository does not melt at 37 degree Celsius, temperature at which the experiment was conducted, this means that the suppository will not melt in the body. Second possible error might arise from the measurement of the amount of PEG 1000 and PEG 6000 used. The amount used should be measured accurately to ensure accurate readings

          3.  Plot a graph of UV absorption against time. Analyse it.


time/ min
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
UV
absorption
0.060
0.075
0.080
0.084
0.087
0.091
0.093
0.095
0.094
0.102
0.106
0.107
0.109
The experiment determine the in vitro release of paracetamol suppositories against time. From the graph of UV absorption against time as shown above, the extent of drug release was assessed from the total amount of drug present in the dissolution medium for every 5 minutes interval. The suppository preparations was used for the assessment of drug release rates. A slope obtained from linear regression analysis of the plot was determined as the drug release rate constant. The decrease in drug release at higher surfactant concentration as obtained is most likely attributable to micellar entrapment of the drug, resulting in retardation of the drug release. Although the surfactants at optimum concentration did not improve drug release but they have absorption-promoting effects so it will be useful if they were incorporated into the suppositories.

The formulations of the suppositories uses mixture of polyethylene glycol which are PEG 1000 and PEG 6000 that different in term of melting range. The desired solidity can be adjusted by choosing the molecular weight and suitable ratios. For example 25% PEG 1000 and 75% PEG 1500 give very soft masses, 25% PEG 4000 S and 75% PEG 6000 will give more solid products.

By using UV spectrophotometry, it can measures the rate of in vitro drug release as a function of time which can reflect either reproducibility of the product manufacturing process or in limited cases, in vivo drug release. A compound will exhibit absorption in the UV region if it contains one or more chromophores such as aromatic nitro, azoxy, nitroso, carbonyl or azo groups. UV-spectra showed that the drug absorbed appreciably at 254 nm so this wavelength was selected as the detection wavelength. The calibration curve for the paracetamol suppository was found to be linear. In the experiment, increasing drug release can be seen on the graph.  Showing that the rate of drug release is increasing against time.


4 Plot a graph of UV absorption against time for formulation suppository that have different composition. Differentiate and discuss the result.




Y-axis=Average UV absorption value
X-axis=Time (min)

Theoretically, the graph obtained should obey the sigmoid curve. But, all the graph obtained by us does not obey the sigmoid curve. The results obtained shown on the graph are increased and decrease at several times. The result shows the unusual sigmoid curve.       
          According to the experimental result obtained, Formulation II suppository has the highest peak, followed by Formulation I, IV and III. Beer-Lambert Laws states that the higher the absorbtion of UV, the higher the amount of drug in the solution. This means that Formulation II has the highest drug release rate compared to the other formulations. While the Formulation III has the lowest drug release rate.
Formulation II and I suppository have higher peak than Formulation IV and III. This means Formulation II and I have higher drug release rate compared to Formulation IV and III. Theoretically, the ideal formulation for suppository to have the highest drug release rate is 40% of PEG 1000 and 60% of PEG 6000. So, the ideal formulation used in this experiment should be the formulation III which contain 33.33% of PEG 1000 and 60% of PEG 6000. The higher the percentage the PEG 6000 used, the higher the drug release rate. This is because PEG 6000 will enhance the drug release. But, too high percentage of PEG 6000 will decrease the drug release rate instead of enhance it. Based on the results obtained from experiment, the suppository that shows highest release rate is from Formulation II. This may be due to some experimental errors occur.
Theoretically, formulation I has the lowest drug release rate because the absence of PEG 6000 in the formulation. Although there is PEG 1000 in the formulation, it only has little effect on drug release. PEG 6000 has much more influence on drug release compared to PEG 1000. But the result that we get is contraindicated with the theory.
Although formulation IV has the highest percentage of PEG 6000, it does not show the highest drug release rate. This is because too many PEG 6000 will cause the formation hydrogen bond between PEG and paracetamol. It requires the longer time to reach the highest value of drug release, as the suppository is the hardest. As a result, the drug release rate decreases.  
          The inaccurate result that we get from the experiment is due to some error happen when conducting the experiment. Example of errors that happen are uneven stirring of the solution, unstable temperature, mistake in the suppository formation and impurities can all lead to the experimental errors.

5 .What are the functions of each of the materials used in the preparation of the suppositories? How does the different composition of PEG 1000 and PEG 6000 used affect the physical characteristics of a suppository formulation as well as its rate of drug release?
The paracetamol in the preparation of susppositories is the active ingredient. It is used to determine the rate of its release from the dialysis bag, affected by different composition of the suppository bases used. PEG 1000 and PEG 6000 are the water soluble suppository bases which dissolve the Paracetamol and they are able to melt and release the drug at or below body temperature. The drug release for polyethylene glycols base depends on the dissolution rate rather than the melting of the base. The different in PEG 1000 and PEG 6000 is their molecular weight. PEG 6000 has a higher molecular weight than PEG 1000, so it is harder too as compared to PEG 1000 as the hardness of polyglycols increases with increasing molecular weight. Therefore, when different composition of the bases used in the suppository formulation, the physical characteristics as well as the rate of drug release will be affected. The suppository produced will be harder and its rate of drug release will be slowed when more of PEG 6000 was used in the formulation. On the other hand, the suppository will be soft and its drug release rate will be higher when lesser PEG 6000 was used in the formulation. Higher proportions of high molecular weight polymers produce preparations which release the drug slowly and are also brittle. Overall, less brittle products which release the drug more readily can be prepared by mixing high polymers with medium and low polymers.

CONCLUSION

Different compositions of bases affect the physical characteristics of suppository formed and its release rate of drugs.

REFERENCES

1.      Aulton, M.E.2002. Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Form Design. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.  
2.      Pharmaceutics, The Science of Dosage Form Design, Michael Aulton, 3rd.
3.  http://www.clariant.com/C125720D002B963C/picklist/C0EB1376B40AC1C9C125726500432C94/$file/Polyethylene_glycols_(PEGs)_and_the_pharmaceutical_industry.pdf
4.       http://pharmlabs.unc.edu/labs/suppository/bases.htm